[ REPORT LIBRARY ]
Eight real reports show what Callimachus can surface, what remains uncertain, and where a human review begins. Open a report alongside the published work and, for the retracted cases, its editorial notice.
[ 01 ] A familiar paper
Start with a single claim and follow the cited source, the retrieved passage, the model's bounded judgement, and the report's final outcome.
[ 02 ] Retraction case studies
These articles were retracted by their publishers. The notes below summarise the publishers' stated reasons; the report links show what Callimachus found in the citations. Scientific and methodological conclusions remain with editors and reviewers.
Intensive Care Medicine · published 2024
DOI 10.1007/s00134-024-07752-6
Retraction noticeThe journal cited noncompliant peer review and many references it could not verify; the authors attributed the reference errors to an AI-assisted PMID conversion.
In the reportUnverifiable and suspect bibliography entries are brought forward for review.
Medical Oncology · published 2024
DOI 10.1007/s12032-024-02563-7
Retraction noticeThe publisher identified nine references it could not locate in the scientific record.
In the reportMost of those entries receive bibliographic warnings; an author-list discrepancy in a real work is flagged separately.
IEEE ICCCI · 2021
DOI 10.1109/ICCCI50826.2021.9402508
Retraction noticeIEEE noted references listed without corresponding citations in the paper, alongside other editorial concerns.
In the reportOnly 1 of 15 references is cited in the text; low coverage now prompts review.
Cureus 15(11): e48625 · 2023
DOI 10.7759/cureus.48625
Retraction noticeThe editors found that references 15–19 did not match their in-text uses, undermining confidence in the review.
In the reportSeveral cited sources in that range are off topic; one has insufficient source text for a conclusion.
International Wound Journal 20: 2664–2672 · 2023
DOI 10.1111/iwj.14140
Retraction noticeThe editors cited methods they could not reproduce, an irrelevant eligibility citation, an absent sensitivity analysis, and text overlap.
In the reportReference 5 is flagged as off topic where the paper discusses eligibility criteria.
Cureus 16(11): e74625 · 2024
DOI 10.7759/cureus.74625
Retraction noticeThree references were irrelevant, including one to a fictitious disease; the editors lost confidence in the article's accuracy.
In the reportThe fictitious-disease reference is unverified; two other references receive off-topic or related-only findings.
Crime Science 9: 8 · 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40163-020-00118-5
Retraction noticeA reanalysis disputed the findings: 16 of 33 included studies reportedly failed the stated selection criteria.
In the reportBibliographic and citation checks are visible. The study-selection audit requires a human reviewer.
These are public presentation copies of completed diagnostic runs. They are for exploring the findings, not for validating an original report seal.